View Single Post
      06-06-2016, 07:58 PM   #160
opasha
Brigadier General
opasha's Avatar
1329
Rep
3,990
Posts

Drives: 2014 BMW X5 50i
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Maryland

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by fwoo54 View Post
I have not tried driving the car in Eco Mode since installing the chip. I rarely do so. However, I'll give it another try this week when I get the car back. (Off topic, they gave me a 428 GC as loaner; can't stand the way the newer, smaller cars steer and handle -- my e92 has that stiff steering and handling that I love).

It seems anecdotally that some people experience tangible performance boost with the RC, some don't -- and so, too, with the BMS piggyback. I'd prefer not to have to shell out $2500 for the Dinan, of which there is sparse feedback on the various forum postings. The car is fast enough stock, but hey, why are we all here if we didn't want to amp it up a bit more.
I really don't understand how these tune chips are that inconsistent. Did something change in the assembly parts that we were unaware of? Did us guys with older chips get the working versions? I got mine back in 2014 when I wrote up the thread for it. To this day, it's been nothing but a champ. I've owned both chips... Both changed the 50i for the better, but I preferred the RC Ultimate over the BMS stage 1 because it just was better in terms of performance and reduction of throttle lag.
Appreciate 1