X5 50 1/4 results

onfireX5 · 10-20-2015, 07:09 PM

3800 ft density altitude hurt the et and mph since the bar was so low. But you get what you get.

onfireX5 · 10-20-2015, 07:13 PM

Track shot

onfireX5 · 10-20-2015, 07:15 PM

vbox

V8LIFE · 04-02-2018, 02:15 PM

Pretty impressive number, were your car stock ?

onfireX5 · 04-02-2018, 04:37 PM

Yes.

rhite95 · 04-03-2018, 07:37 AM

Did you get a time slip from the track?

Very nice number !!

kanvas · 04-03-2018, 07:17 PM

The 50i is such a sleeper. Love it!

perry8912 · 04-04-2018, 01:41 PM

Wow, the actual result is way better than the dyno numbers.

To be honest, After seeing those dyno graph, I thought the 50i performance should be close to the 35i rather than the M. But I’m glad I was wrong.

CT335xi · 04-04-2018, 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by perry8912

Wow, the actual result is way better than the dyno numbers.

To be honest, After seeing those dyno graph, I thought the 50i performance should be close to the 35i rather than the M. But I’m glad I was wrong.

What dyno graphs are you talking about? The 50i is probably over a second faster in the 1/4 also.

perry8912 · 04-04-2018, 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CT335xi

What dyno graphs are you talking about? The 50i is probably over a second faster in the 1/4 also.

The n63tu is rated 445hp and 480lb.ft on paper. In my opinion, the dyno result are a bit off from that rated number, which unlike N63 or N55, it actually come pretty close to the rated number. And the dyno graphs I mentioned is from bms website.

But anyway, the actual drag time comes out pretty good, which is enough.

CT335xi · 04-04-2018, 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by perry8912

The n63tu is rated 445hp and 480lb.ft on paper. In my opinion, the dyno result are a bit off from that rated number, which unlike N63 or N55, it actually come pretty close to the rated number. And the dyno graphs I mentioned is from bms website.

But anyway, the actual drag time comes out pretty good, which is enough.

I got what your saying , for example a 335i with a n54 will put down like 275-280 whp when rated at 300 crank hp. They are obviously making more power then what the factory is rating them at. I think what the 50i put down is right in line with the factory rating. I have a thread out there with my dyno numbers on a mustang dyno which are typically lower reading but have seen guys put down 400 on dyno jet which would actually make the 445 also under rated.

CT335xi · 04-04-2018, 05:13 PM

Also keep in mind the power and torque needed to accelerate a 5300 +lb suv to a high 12 sec 1/4??? Little sandbagging you think maybe??

perry8912 · 04-04-2018, 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CT335xi

Also keep in mind the power and torque needed to accelerate a 5300 +lb suv to a high 12 sec 1/4??? Little sandbagging you think maybe??

Yeah, the Car and driver magazine and Motor trend both confirmed the 1/4 mile result, so I think the number should be legit.

I hope the G05 could lose some weight, and we will see low 12 sec for next 50i

CT335xi · 04-04-2018, 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by perry8912

Yeah, the Car and driver magazine and Motor trend both confirmed the 1/4 mile result, so I think the number should be legit.

I hope the G05 could lose some weight, and we will see low 12 sec for next 50i

That would be nice and just as fast as the current x5m!!

CT335xi · 04-04-2018, 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onfireX5

3800 ft density altitude hurt the et and mph since the bar was so low. But you get what you get.

onfirex5 if the da was actually better on your run how much of and improvement to the et and trap ?

pits200 · 04-04-2018, 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CT335xi

onfirex5 if the da was actually better on your run how much of and improvement to the et and trap ?

Da doesn't impact FI vehicles as much l, at best maybe another tenth or 2 if better. I can't see him running better than a 12.5.

CT335xi · 04-04-2018, 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pits200

Da doesn't impact FI vehicles as much l, at best maybe another tenth or 2 if better. I can't see him running better than a 12.5.

Still pretty fast for bone stock ! Thanks man

Nickelodeon · 05-02-2018, 05:32 PM

OMG, 12.7sec??? That’s not possible!!! My 550hp e70 x5m runs exact the same 0-400 number....

CT335xi · 05-02-2018, 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nickelodeon

OMG, 12.7sec??? That’s not possible!!! My 550hp e70 x5m runs exact the same 0-400 number....

You mean 1/4 mile time??? He went to the strip and proved it what more do you need to believe it haha.

rhite95 · 05-03-2018, 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rhite95

Did you get a time slip from the track?

Very nice number !!

I still would like to see a time slip. If you got one....

10-20-2015, 07:09 PM	#1
onfireX5 Brigadier General 3618 Rep 4,532 Posts Drives: F90M5,F85X5M Join Date: Jul 2015 Location: Va iTrader: (0)	X5 50 1/4 results 3800 ft density altitude hurt the et and mph since the bar was so low. But you get what you get. Attached Images
	Appreciate 0 Tweet Quote

10-20-2015, 07:13 PM	#2
onfireX5 Brigadier General 3618 Rep 4,532 Posts Drives: F90M5,F85X5M Join Date: Jul 2015 Location: Va iTrader: (0)	Track shot Attached Images
	Appreciate 2 kanvas644.00 perry8912101.00 Quote

10-20-2015, 07:15 PM	#3
onfireX5 Brigadier General 3618 Rep 4,532 Posts Drives: F90M5,F85X5M Join Date: Jul 2015 Location: Va iTrader: (0)	vbox Attached Images
	Appreciate 3 OFFWHITEX5325.50 perry8912101.00 Quote

04-02-2018, 02:15 PM	#4
V8LIFE Private 26 Rep 60 Posts Drives: 650i Join Date: Mar 2018 Location: Houston iTrader: (0)	Pretty impressive number, were your car stock ?
	Appreciate 0 Quote

04-02-2018, 04:37 PM	#5
onfireX5 Brigadier General 3618 Rep 4,532 Posts Drives: F90M5,F85X5M Join Date: Jul 2015 Location: Va iTrader: (0)	Yes.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

		BMW X5 and X6 Forum (F15/F16) > BMW X5 (F15) and BMW X6 (F16) Forum > BMW X5 and X6 (F15/F16) Forum
X5 50 1/4 results

04-03-2018, 07:37 AM	#6
rhite95 Private First Class 54 Rep 133 Posts Drives: 2014 X5 xDrive50i M Sport Join Date: May 2017 Location: FL iTrader: (0)	Did you get a time slip from the track? Very nice number !! __________________ 2014 BMW X5 xDrive50i M Sport 2014 ROUSH RS3 A6
	Appreciate 0 Quote

04-03-2018, 07:17 PM	#7
kanvas Major 644 Rep 1,170 Posts Drives: V8 Join Date: Dec 2014 Location: Orange County, CA iTrader: (2)	The 50i is such a sleeper. Love it! __________________ 2001 X5 4.4i - sold but never forgotten! 2014 X5 xDrive50i
	Appreciate 0 Quote

04-04-2018, 01:41 PM	#8
perry8912 Second Lieutenant 101 Rep 239 Posts Drives: bmw x5 Join Date: Aug 2015 Location: Calgary, AB iTrader: (0)	Wow, the actual result is way better than the dyno numbers. To be honest, After seeing those dyno graph, I thought the 50i performance should be close to the 35i rather than the M. But I’m glad I was wrong.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

04-04-2018, 05:13 PM	#12
CT335xi Major 683 Rep 1,433 Posts Drives: 2022 x5 m50i, 2005 evo 8 Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: Newtown, Ct iTrader: (0)	Also keep in mind the power and torque needed to accelerate a 5300 +lb suv to a high 12 sec 1/4??? Little sandbagging you think maybe?? __________________ 2022 x5 m50i - Dravit grey 2005 evo 8 (current) built 2.3 488/409 mustang dyno Old stable mates - 87 325i, 88 m3, 90 m3, 97 m3 4dr, 04 325xi, 91 gmc Syclone, 08 335xi, and 13 x3 35i msp 2014 x5 50i msport
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-02-2018, 05:32 PM	#18
Nickelodeon Registered 0 Rep 1 Posts Drives: 2012 X5m Join Date: May 2018 Location: Chicago iTrader: (0)	OMG, 12.7sec??? That’s not possible!!! My 550hp e70 x5m runs exact the same 0-400 number....
	Appreciate 0 Quote

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search