09-08-2015, 02:06 PM | #67 | |
Captain
250
Rep 748
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Ones drove a Reliant Robin. )))
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-08-2015, 05:01 PM | #68 |
Lieutenant General
11572
Rep 11,136
Posts |
I really like the new XC90, especially the R-Design. Still warming up to the rear though. My father had a rental V70 for a month last year and I absolutely loved driving it. The GPS was by far some of the best I've experienced in a long time.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-08-2015, 05:45 PM | #69 | |
Herr Oberst
244
Rep 531
Posts |
Quote:
Nikes and iPhones is a terrible analogy. But if you don't care for the above comparison, the F-150 outsells the Silverado. Well, no need to compare the two. Ford must be better, right? I know who you are, too, Kzang. You have a nice car but little knowledge of how many of the systems actually function. You ask questions and get mad when someone gives you an answer you don't like. You don't like me. That's fine. Feel free not to respond and I'll do the same. I can do without your worn out "but it's a BMW, muffy, not some poor people car /chortle chortle/" brand of arrogance that ou continually display on here and at BF. Sometimes you seem decent and sometimes not. This must be one of your bad days. Let's agree to go our separate ways and save the site moderators the trouble. Artem, nothing personal. I have no emotion invested in the discussion and thus it doesn't feel like an argument to me, just different opinions. Yes, BMW has marketed the heck out of the X5. That alone doesn't make it better than the Volvo. They're both excellent approaches to problem of movin people and things across terrain. I'd imagine the forthcoming X7 will be more comparable to the Volvo in handling dynamics and space. Enjoy your X5! Last edited by lowlevelhell; 09-08-2015 at 06:01 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-08-2015, 06:29 PM | #70 | ||
Captain
250
Rep 748
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Ones drove a Reliant Robin. )))
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
09-08-2015, 06:59 PM | #71 | |
Herr Oberst
244
Rep 531
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-08-2015, 07:15 PM | #72 |
Captain
250
Rep 748
Posts |
I came to X5 from Touareg ( Second version, AKA T2), Leased it back in 2008 February, and sold in in March of this year. Sold it after my friend finally talked me into selling one to him ( after attacking me slowly for 2 years). Only car i ever kept after lease and loved every bit of it. Truly well build thing. Third generation ( current one) is great, fun to drive though lost some of toughness which first and second gen were known for. However when it was time for me to get one their lease program was horrid. I heard VW changed their lease programs now.
__________________
Ones drove a Reliant Robin. )))
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-08-2015, 07:19 PM | #73 |
First Lieutenant
176
Rep 360
Posts
Drives: 1M; E90 M3 ZCP; M4 GTS
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Minneapolis, MN
|
Woah, not a lot of Volvo love...but I suppose the inverse would play out on a Volvo forum. I love my Volvo, and I have a lot of respect for the new XC.
__________________
-kskpsu
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-08-2015, 07:30 PM | #74 |
Captain
250
Rep 748
Posts |
Looks great!
__________________
Ones drove a Reliant Robin. )))
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-08-2015, 07:43 PM | #75 | |
Major General
3240
Rep 5,066
Posts |
Quote:
And your remarks about me being rich and having no knowledge about my X5 is disturbing.... perhaps you should label every other members here the same since we all have the F15 X5/X6. I will take your advice and just ignore you because you don't contribute to this or the other forums in anyway except bring threads like this down to bickering and senseless arguments.
__________________
2015 F15 X5 35i Msport Space Grey M Performance parts MPPK, MPE
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-08-2015, 08:07 PM | #76 | ||
First Lieutenant
93
Rep 356
Posts |
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
09-08-2015, 09:32 PM | #77 | |
Registered
0
Rep 2
Posts |
Quote:
Volvo checks a lot of the boxes on paper and has nice features (altho many are gimmicks IMO, I my last cat was a Volvo), but doesn't have the full package and I can see a lot of potential issues with getting the 1st generation... Btw, a 2015 x5 can be purchased around 10% off MSRP vs almost no discount on the xc90. Makes X5 a great deal in comparison (made my decision a lot easier) |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-08-2015, 09:46 PM | #78 | |
Lieutenant
69
Rep 424
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-08-2015, 11:23 PM | #80 |
Herr Oberst
244
Rep 531
Posts |
Same old characters, same old bleating, same old stuff the salesman (sorry..."client advisor" ) told them. We should number the responses here. It would save a lot of time.
Looking forward to having our new sparkling brown owner weigh in on his switch from Volvo to BMW. I'm curious as to which generation he had. My guess would be one of the later models of the last generation. Definitely a different vehicle. |
Appreciate
0
|
09-08-2015, 11:26 PM | #81 | |
Herr Oberst
244
Rep 531
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-08-2015, 11:27 PM | #82 |
Herr Oberst
244
Rep 531
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-11-2015, 10:36 AM | #83 |
Captain
398
Rep 690
Posts |
As many of us did, I also shopped around and looked at the RR, X5, XC90, ML, and Porsche Cayenne.
The RR is beautiful from the outside but I thought the interior was quite blend and workmanship was not up to par. For example, the sunroof in the X5 is much more robust than in the RR. The RR had the same sunroof materials like in my prior 2014 VW Touareg. Also, the technology in the RR seemed dated to me with a smaller navi screen. Granted I only looked at the more basic RRs but still I felt quality was not there. Further, and more importantly, the price of the RR Sport base level was at least $72-74k and not being discounted whereas I got an X5 with M-pack and nicely equipped for $62.5k. That's about $300 a month in lease payment difference which was a big deal for me. Seems to me the deal with the RR is that you pay premium to get the air suspension and offroad capabilities, which I would have rarely used. Also, body roll was bad in the RR as compared to the X-5 The XC90 is designed well but again the quality of materials is at PAR or below the X-5 IMHO. I like the design and Thor lights but 4 cylinder engine is really discouraging. Also, the fact they were on the verge of bankruptcy and this model just came out this year is a bit discouraging (don't like to beta test with my kids in the car). We had a volvo 850 back in the 90s in the family and that had lasted close to 200k in miles but it was plagued with issues. Not sure the current volvos are built the same way. ML is nice and solid but fairly simple. I didn't like the current exterior design as much but may like the GLE better when it comes out. Definitely feels solid and quality materials. AC knobs are the same as in the basic C class for which I think the BMW has a better system. Merc seems to copy BMW in a lot of things (e.g., sport, sport plus and comfort button) and tries to do them in a better way but not sure they really working. The Porsche is really really cool and having a Touareg previously I had dreamed of getting the Porsche next but 1) price was much higher, 2) interior technology was not on par in the base models, and 3) didn't feel like it was as a practical car to take to the supermarket as an X5. I wanted to blend in more. The Touareg was a toned down version of the Cayenne but the interior quality and service center was not on par with BMW. however, I would definitely continue considering Porsche going forward... just look at the brake calipers as compared to the x5s and also the fact that Porsche is all business both on road and off road with no plastic fenders... Last but not least, the X5 ticked all the boxes for me, 1) the engine is a worldclass winner, 2) the quality and technology is awesome, 3) this forum, 4) service center is great, 5) it's a practical car that is somewhat reasonable in price and can be manageable and 6) the design of it is just beautiful |
Appreciate
0
|
09-19-2015, 09:20 PM | #84 | |
19 X5 1998 M Roadster
64
Rep 1,503
Posts
Drives: 135i Alpine White / Terra
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: SW Florida
|
Quote:
My BMW. Front brakes at 9,000 miles, HPFP ordeal, 2x full reprogram of the electronics to get the nav to finally stay solid and work. Collectively my little 135 and currently at 31k miles, garage queen, has spent approx 27 days out of service. My 11 LR4 spend 2 days in shop for warranty repair on rear brakes and one day was waiting for parts. The '13 no days in shop yet and 17k miles. I'd buy another BMW or Land Rover without a second thought. The new XC90 shouldn't be judged old the current line up. The new design language and branding will change things up. I think Volvo has a big hit on their hands. I just wish they would offer a diesel. Pondering the new X1, but not sure I want to go that small. Love the 328d Touring, but again quite small coming from the LR4 with 90 cubic feet with the seats down. But again, I really don't need all that space anymore. The new DiscoveryLR5 for 2017, not too sure I'm keen on it being so rounded and loosing the Discovery iconic look. Just my 2 cents
__________________
'09 135i Dinan In BMW heaven 09.28.2022 - Stage 2/Alpine White w/Terracotta /High Gloss Black Trim/ZCW/ZPP/ZSP w/313's /CA/PDC/Steptronic/
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-20-2015, 05:10 PM | #85 |
New Member
4
Rep 25
Posts |
I really liked the RR sport the looks and the interior. The v6 was ok but the v8 was a lot of fun, but in the end we were looking at $10-25k more over the X5, then add maintenance and shorter range/worse fuel mileage and we went with the X5. I would like to test drive the new RR sport diesel though.
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|