Quote:
Originally Posted by OnerDriver
Hi moderators,
Not sure this is the right place to pose this question, feel free to delete it if inappropriate.
I've seen a couple of threads be locked without an apparent reason, and would like to ask if the concept of a "safe space" for respectful political discussion has been discussed among the forum administration.
Meaning, politics and religion are topics of great contention, nobody will agree 100% with anyone here. That's the point.
So long as people are being respectful, why does a thread need to be locked? Can't we just warn people that create disrespectful posts so that we know when we've crossed a line, and give us a chance to re-write them, or delete these posts, instead of locking the whole thread?
I reckon some forum members apparently report a post that's "offensive" to them (because they disagree with it) and the whole thread gets locked... that's disappointing.
Basically asking if this has been discussed, so we can have a place to discuss even when the topics are controversial (natural of politics and religion) and to see what everyone thinks.
Cheers!
|
I agree with you on this. It would be nice to see a debate resolve itself without having to lock the thread completely. As you say an initial warning might be the way to keep those who can't be civil in cheque.