02-05-2018, 12:25 PM | #1 |
First Lieutenant
327
Rep 303
Posts |
Tire Weight Data: RFs vs. Non-RFs
Upon taking delivery of my 2018 X5 xDrive35i I quickly replaced my factory equipped 21” Run-Flats with non Run-Flat tires. I was curious about the possible weight reduction associated with non Run-Flats so I decided to conduct official weigh-ins.
My X5 came equipped with 21” DUNLOP SP SPORT MAXX DSST Run-Flat performance summer tires. Fronts weigh 42.0 lbs. each; rears weigh 47.8 lbs. each. Total tire weight = 179.6 lbs. My replacement tires are factory size 21” MICHELIN PILOT SUPER SPORT non Run-Flat performance summer tires. Fronts weigh 29.5 lbs. each; rears weigh 33.0 lbs. each. Total tire weight = 125 lbs. Total tire weight reduction achieved from switching to non Run-Flats = 54.6 lbs. However… I also added a 19” space saver emergency spare kit (19” because I’m running MPBK) that added back 50.6 lbs. Overall, for me the move to non Run-Flat tires AND a spare tire kit had neutral impact on total vehicle weight and tire costs. Then, factoring in a smoother ride, less road noise, better traction, and improved MPG, the switch to non-Run Flats was a no brainer. |
02-05-2018, 12:44 PM | #2 |
Captain
1191
Rep 847
Posts |
When I switched to 24s I can barely feel a difference in stiffness compared to my RF 21s.
__________________
'23 B8, '84 Monte Carlo SS, '23 Escalade, '21 S 580, '20 AMG GT 53 , '18 LS 500, '18 X6, '16 Corvette, '12 750Li, '14 GS 350, '13 ES 350, '10 Maxima, '09 Challenger |
Appreciate
0
|
02-05-2018, 02:01 PM | #3 |
Captain
443
Rep 788
Posts |
I definitely notice an improvement with mpg - I have the winter non RFT and summer RFT and the winters add up to 10% better mpg.
Weight is certainly one reason for this!
__________________
Old Wheels - X5M50d in Carbon Black
New Wheels - X7M50d in Phytonic Blue |
Appreciate
0
|
02-06-2018, 09:33 AM | #5 | |
Private First Class
54
Rep 133
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
2014 BMW X5 xDrive50i M Sport
2014 ROUSH RS3 A6 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-06-2018, 10:24 AM | #6 |
Second Lieutenant
92
Rep 252
Posts |
There is no "however" needed. You're neglecting the fact that you removed 54lbs of unsprung weight. You adding the 50lb spare tire doesn't totally negate the advantages of the lighter wheels and tires. You have less rotating mass/inertia to overcome while accelerating.
__________________
-2010 BMW 135i - Titanium Silver - Procede v3/ETS 5" IC/AR Catless DP>N54mid>Berk Race/BMS OCC/VRSF Turbo Inlets & CP/SP rotors/Pagid RS29/APEX ARC8/Ohlins DFV/M3 Full Suspension and Bushings/Wavetrac LSD // 395rwhp/469rwtq on 91oct
-2014 Toyota Sequoia Platinum - Overlander |
Appreciate
0
|
02-06-2018, 10:42 AM | #7 | |
Captain
683
Rep 998
Posts |
True, if i remember correctly unsprung/sprung weight ratio is 1 to 5, so removing 1 lbs of unsprung weight is equals to removing 5 lbs of sprung weight. I would invest into light wheels/tires first before any other performance mods (except maybe a good ECU tune ).
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-06-2018, 12:55 PM | #8 |
First Lieutenant
327
Rep 303
Posts |
Sorry, I never got a chance to test out the Dunlops. Upon talking delivery of my new X5, the first place I drove to was my Costco Tire Center to remove them.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-06-2018, 06:09 PM | #9 |
Colonel
2114
Rep 2,388
Posts |
There's a descent amount of rotational weight that can be shed off going from RFT to non RFT. Also, forged 20'' rims can shed yet another chunk of rotational weight. It will be noticeable during acceleration and braking (and a bit better mpg)
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|