10-02-2018, 06:02 PM | #1 |
New Member
5
Rep 16
Posts |
Aggressive wheel & tire fitment questions
New to this board, but did quite a bit of research and still not clear on the best possible options for an aggressive offset. I have an '15 xdrive50i M and my goal is to have a wheel/tire combo with enough sidewall and sits flush with the fenders. Also want to make sure the tires do not jam the wheel well under compression.
Below are a few options of tire sizes, but I don't know what offset I need to be flush with the fenders. I also will be using aftermarket wheels. 1. 285/35R22 - 29.88" tall 2. 275/45R20 - 29.8" tall 3. 275/45R22 - 31. 8" tall (might not fit and rubbing depends on wheel width and offset) On an xDrive, the overall tire and wheel height needs to be the same all around or the front and back are within a 1 to 2% delta to not have issues. The f15 stock tire heights are 19"-29.03", 20"-28.66", and 21"-28.854". If all 4 are over 29" or even 30" there doesn't seem to be a problem, as long as they're all equal. After researching the forum and from the math, I could still run these tire sizes in a staggered set up. That would mean the rear wheels would have to be a certain width and offset. I just don't know what that is. A popular set up I've read is: Front: 295/30R22 on 22x10.5 ET25. total poke:108.4mm Rear: 335/25R22 on 22x12 ET35. total poke: 117.4 mm If that's the case, the wheel offset and width for a 285/35R22 tire would need to be either: For the front 22x10 ET 20. total poke: 107mm 22x10.5 ET 25. total poke: 108.4mm For the back 22x10 ET 10. total poke: 117mm 22x10.5 ET 15. total poke: 118.4 mm 22x11 ET 25. total poke: 114.7mm 22x11.5 ET 30. total poke: 116.1mm 22x12 ET 35. total poke: 117.4mm Problem is, the further the wheel and tire are from the wheel well, the higher likelyhood of it rubbing the inner wheel well. One member has 285/35R22 and with a 40mm offset experiences slight rubbing at full lock. If anyone has pictures of larger tires it would be interesting to hear your feedback on rubbing or clearing the outer wheel well when articulating. I know this is a long winded post, but wanted to have all the facts out there for reference. I appreciate any help on this. Last edited by texasrr; 10-03-2018 at 03:03 PM.. |
10-03-2018, 10:56 AM | #2 |
Major
843
Rep 1,497
Posts |
Good job on doing you're homework I'm super close to pulling the trigger on some 22" reps.
Wheels specs: 22 X 10 Front +40 offset 22 X 11 Rear +35 offset I've decided the most aggressive I'm willing to go with tires is: 295/30/R22 Fronts 335/25/R22 Rears I'll attach the tire calculator comparing the two: |
Appreciate
0
|
10-03-2018, 02:42 PM | #3 |
New Member
5
Rep 16
Posts |
This is one of the recommendations I've heard before from a few shops. My only issue is the tire height isn't enough. I would prefer to have a little more meat on the tires. Below are two different set ups I'm considering after a few phone calls.
Square: 22x9 ET 20 w/ 285/35r22 - height 29.88" - Supposedly front will sit flush and back may sit flush. Could always add an HR hubcentric 11mm space in the rear to push it out to sit flush. Staggered conservative: Front: 22x9 ET 20 w/ 295/30r22- height 29.02" Rear: 22x11 ET 25 w/335/25r22 - height 28.62" delta of 0.4 mm or 0.016" - will be fine for xDrive Staggered aggresive: Front: 22x9 ET 20 w/ 285/35r22 - height 29.88" Rear: 22x11 ET 25 w/ 295/35r22 - height 30.12" delta of 0.24 mm or 0.009" - will be fine for xDrive With these offsets I'm not sure if they will rub. I'm doing more research to see where I land. Last edited by texasrr; 10-03-2018 at 02:56 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
10-03-2018, 02:48 PM | #4 |
Major
843
Rep 1,497
Posts |
Square would be nice but staggered looks so much more aggressive. Sucks you can't rotate tires but that's a reason I'm looking at cheaper tires (Atturo)
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-03-2018, 03:01 PM | #5 |
New Member
5
Rep 16
Posts |
The Toyo Proxes III seem to be the best bang for your buck and be a quality tire. Pirelli and Continental also have tires for the staggered set up, but are a little more than the Toyo. Depending on size the Nitto Invo or 420S is also an option.
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-03-2018, 04:57 PM | #6 |
General
12968
Rep 18,715
Posts |
Going bigger on the overall diameter is fine generally, but remember that you will have a wrong speed reading, might have rubbing issue, and might cause damage to your transmission and/or transfer case if the difference ratio is not correct.
__________________
Email:sales@rgsport.com | IG:RGSport_USA | Web:RGSportShop.com PM for Everyday DEALS!! MSS • iSweep • RaceChip • Sterckenn • AutoTecknic • Akrapovic • Vossen Wheels • Eventuri Active Autowerke • KW • H&R • Ohlins • Remus • and more... |
Appreciate
0
|
10-03-2018, 10:54 PM | #7 | ||
Master of one
431
Rep 486
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
Vorsteiner Front 22x10 +35 w/ 5mm spacers and 295/30/22 Rear: 22x11 +30 w/ 12mm spacers and 335/25/22 Lowered on H&R Spring Ratio diameter difference between front and rear is 1.4%. Been running this for a few month. No drive train issues or code thrown. Wheels are flush to the fender with the spaces. Without spacers, it will tuck inside the fenders. Tires are flush with the rim. Doesn't stretch. |
||
Appreciate
1
menelaos1226.00 |
10-04-2018, 10:30 AM | #8 | |
New Member
5
Rep 16
Posts |
Quote:
That looks to be the perfect set up if you lower the vehicle and has more sidewall on the tire than I expected. I'm more than likely not going to lower mine, so the thin sidewalls will look goofy. Good to know they sit flush with the following math: Front: 97mm of poke Rear: 121.7 mm of poke My new issue now is the tire manufactures require a minimum wheel width spec of 9.5" to 11" for a 285/35r22 or 295/30r22. Most aftermarket wheels I've found are 22x9. Does anyone have any experience of fitting those 2 tire sizes to a 22x9? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-04-2018, 10:45 AM | #9 | |
Major
843
Rep 1,497
Posts |
Quote:
I haven't priced the Toyo's yet. Mind letting me know how much you spent on tires? Thanks |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-04-2018, 11:34 AM | #10 | |
Master of one
431
Rep 486
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
1
M302_imola842.50 |
10-04-2018, 11:37 AM | #11 | |
Master of one
431
Rep 486
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-05-2018, 09:37 AM | #12 |
Major
843
Rep 1,497
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-05-2018, 01:58 PM | #13 |
New Member
5
Rep 16
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-05-2018, 08:43 PM | #15 | |
Master of one
431
Rep 486
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-13-2018, 09:50 PM | #16 |
New Member
5
Rep 16
Posts |
Settled on the perfect set up for me
Decided to risk it and it really paid off for what I was looking for. Below is the set up:
TSW Mosports 22x10.5 ET35 with total poke 98.4 mm. Tires - 285/35R22 29.88" tall 22x11 ET25 with total poke 114.7 mm. Tires - 295/35R22 30.12" tall The delta on this is less than the common combo of 295/30r22 and 335/25r22. No issues with xDrive. In downtown Houston I needed the higher sidewall for rougher roads. The front wheel is a perfect fit and sits flush with the M Sport fenders. No rub at full lock going forward or in reverse. The rear could use another 8 MM to sit exactly flush, but they are wide. Based on what diesel733 has on the rear, 121 mm of total poke is ideal. These also fill up the wheel well without having to lower. Thanks for all the help guys! |
Appreciate
1
M302_imola842.50 |
10-13-2018, 11:15 PM | #17 | ||
Master of one
431
Rep 486
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
1
texasrr5.00 |
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|